How Does Claude Haiku 4 Compare to GPT-4o Mini?

Budget model showdown: cheapest Anthropic vs cheapest OpenAI. GPT-4o Mini is cheaper on both input and output. Claude Haiku 4 scores higher (78 vs 75/100).

Side-by-Side Pricing

MetricClaude Haiku 4GPT-4o Mini
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.80$0.15
Output (per 1M tokens)$4.00$0.60
1-page summary cost$0.0022<$0.001
10K conversation cost$0.0144$0.0024

Quality & Benchmarks

MetricClaude Haiku 4GPT-4o Mini
Aggregate quality score78/10075/100
Best forclassification, extraction, high-volume taskshigh-volume, budget tasks, fine-tuning base
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI

Speed & Context Window

MetricClaude Haiku 4GPT-4o Mini
Speed (tokens/sec)150 tok/s130 tok/s
Context window200K128K

Claude Haiku 4 is faster at 150 tok/s vs 130 tok/s. Claude Haiku 4 supports 200K context vs GPT-4o Mini's 128K.

Privacy & Data Handling

AspectClaude Haiku 4GPT-4o Mini
Data retentionNot used for training (API)Not used for training (API)
SOC 2YesYes
EU data residencyAvailable on requestAvailable on request

Verdict: When to Pick Each

Pick GPT-4o Mini if you want better value (quality per dollar). Pick Claude Haiku 4 if you need peak quality.

FAQ

Is Claude Haiku 4 better than GPT-4o Mini?

Claude Haiku 4 scores 78/100 vs GPT-4o Mini at 75/100. Claude Haiku 4 is best for classification, extraction, high-volume tasks. GPT-4o Mini is best for high-volume, budget tasks, fine-tuning base. The right choice depends on your use case and budget.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4 or GPT-4o Mini?

GPT-4o Mini is cheaper on both input and output.

Can I switch between Claude Haiku 4 and GPT-4o Mini?

Yes. Both models support standard chat completion APIs. You can use model routing to send simple queries to the cheaper model and complex queries to the more capable one, optimizing your costs.

Prices last verified: April 2026. Pricing may change — always check provider websites for current rates.

Calculate your LLM API costs with KickLLM — free, no sign-up required.